Consumer confidence in organizations’ ability to protect biometric data has collapsed over the past several years. According to a 2024 GetApp survey reported by Security Magazine, just 5% of consumers trust that their biometric data is secure with technology companies, down from 28% in 2022. Trust in specific modalities has followed the same trajectory: confidence in face scans has dropped from 44% to 33%, voice scans from 34% to 20%, and fingerprints from 63% to 50%. Nearly half of Americans report concern that facial recognition technology is tracking them beyond their personal devices. Researchers have identified the core anxieties as unchangeable data breaches, potential misuse by authorities, and algorithmic bias.
What makes this a strategic problem for CISOs and fraud leaders, not just a public relations one, is that organizations are simultaneously under pressure to verify more. Fraud volumes are rising. Regulatory frameworks are tightening. Synthetic identity attacks are scaling at a pace that makes knowledge-based authentication increasingly untenable. The answer to that pressure cannot be to collect and retain more biometric data, because that approach is precisely what eroded consumer trust in the first place.
The core problem is that verification has historically required accumulating far more personal data than any single transaction demands. That accumulation is what creates the surveillance footprint, the regulatory liability, and the trust deficit measured in those statistics. Fortunately, the architecture to verify identity rigorously without building a dossier is already in production.
What eIDAS 2.0 Is Actually Telling Organizations
The European Union’s eIDAS 2.0 regulation is frequently discussed as a compliance framework. It’s more usefully understood as a directional signal about where identity infrastructure is heading globally, and that direction points decisively toward selective disclosure and user-controlled credentials. The concept at the center of eIDAS 2.0 is straightforward once you examine it. A user can prove they are over 18 without revealing their birthdate. They can confirm employment eligibility without exposing their full work history. They can verify citizenship without disclosing their home address. The underlying data stays with the user. What passes to the verifying organization is a cryptographically confirmed claim that this assertion is true. Nothing more is transmitted, and nothing more is stored on the other side of the exchange.
EU Member States are required to offer European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallets by end of 2026. In parallel, Apple Wallet and Google Wallet have expanded mobile driving license support across an increasing number of U.S. states, with TSA accepting mobile driving licenses (mDLs) from participating jurisdictions. The infrastructure for digital wallets is scaling under enforceable governance frameworks, with liability rules and certified conformance programs attached. Organizations still architecting verification systems around data collection are building against the direction of regulation. GDPR, BIPA, CPRA, and eIDAS 2.0 are not four separate compliance obligations. They are four expressions of the same underlying principle: collect what you need, prove the claim, and give users meaningful control over what happens next.
FAQs
How long does onboarding take?Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Maecenas dignissim auctor suscipit. Nam hendrerit tristique turpis. This can be whatever we want but should be clear and concise. When we need to guide users to more details, we should include inline or external links that are clearly indicated visually and always open in a new tab.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Maecenas dignissim auctor suscipit. Nam hendrerit tristique turpis. This can be whatever we want but should be clear and concise. Where we need to navigate the user to more details, we should include inline links or external links clearly indicated visually and opening in a new tab at all times.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Maecenas dignissim auctor suscipit. Nam hendrerit tristique turpis. This can be whatever we want but should be clear and concise. Where we need to navigate the user to more details, we should include inline links or external links↗ clearly indicated visually and opening in a new tab at all times.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Maecenas dignissim auctor suscipit. Nam hendrerit tristique turpis. This can be whatever we want but should be clear and concise. Where we need to navigate the user to more details, we should include inline links or external links↗ clearly indicated visually and opening in a new tab at all times.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Maecenas dignissim auctor suscipit. Nam hendrerit tristique turpis. This can be whatever we want but should be clear and concise. Where we need to navigate the user to more details, we should include inline links or external links↗ clearly indicated visually and opening in a new tab at all times.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. Maecenas dignissim auctor suscipit. Nam hendrerit tristique turpis. This can be whatever we want, but it should be clear and concise. Where we need to navigate the user to more details, we should include inline links or external links↗, clearly indicated visually and opening in a new tab at all times.
What eIDAS 2.0 Is Actually Telling Organizations
The European Union’s eIDAS 2.0 regulation is frequently discussed as a compliance framework. It’s more usefully understood as a directional signal about where identity infrastructure is heading globally, and that direction points decisively toward selective disclosure and user-controlled credentials. The concept at the center of eIDAS 2.0 is straightforward once you examine it. A user can prove they are over 18 without revealing their birthdate. They can confirm employment eligibility without exposing their full work history. They can verify citizenship without disclosing their home address. The underlying data stays with the user. What passes to the verifying organization is a cryptographically confirmed claim that this assertion is true. Nothing more is transmitted, and nothing more is stored on the other side of the exchange.
EU Member States are required to offer European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallets by end of 2026. In parallel, Apple Wallet and Google Wallet have expanded mobile driving license support across an increasing number of U.S. states, with TSA accepting mobile driving licenses (mDLs) from participating jurisdictions. The infrastructure for digital wallets is scaling under enforceable governance frameworks, with liability rules and certified conformance programs attached. Organizations still architecting verification systems around data collection are building against the direction of regulation. GDPR, BIPA, CPRA, and eIDAS 2.0 are not four separate compliance obligations. They are four expressions of the same underlying principle: collect what you need, prove the claim, and give users meaningful control over what happens next.
What eIDAS 2.0 Is Actually Telling Organizations
The European Union’s eIDAS 2.0 regulation is frequently discussed as a compliance framework. It’s more usefully understood as a directional signal about where identity infrastructure is heading globally, and that direction points decisively toward selective disclosure and user-controlled credentials. The concept at the center of eIDAS 2.0 is straightforward once you examine it. A user can prove they are over 18 without revealing their birthdate. They can confirm employment eligibility without exposing their full work history. They can verify citizenship without disclosing their home address. The underlying data stays with the user. What passes to the verifying organization is a cryptographically confirmed claim that this assertion is true. Nothing more is transmitted, and nothing more is stored on the other side of the exchange.
EU Member States are required to offer European Digital Identity (EUDI) Wallets by end of 2026. In parallel, Apple Wallet and Google Wallet have expanded mobile driving license support across an increasing number of U.S. states, with TSA accepting mobile driving licenses (mDLs) from participating jurisdictions. The infrastructure for digital wallets is scaling under enforceable governance frameworks, with liability rules and certified conformance programs attached. Organizations still architecting verification systems around data collection are building against the direction of regulation. GDPR, BIPA, CPRA, and eIDAS 2.0 are not four separate compliance obligations. They are four expressions of the same underlying principle: collect what you need, prove the claim, and give users meaningful control over what happens next.
